ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 16 · Como
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Schepper
⚙️ Grinder
Rublev
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 58% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 5,936 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Andrey Rublev here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Schepper | Rublev |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–3 | 11–6 |
| Avg odds | 2.94 | 2.22 |
| ROI % | -61.3% | -7.8% |
| Units P/L | -2.45u | -1.33u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Schepper
0
Rublev
Sep 1, 2016
Como
C Clay · Round of 16
Feb 16, 2016
Cherbourg
H Hard · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Schepper | Rublev |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 65.2% | 63% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 64.6% | 70.1% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 35.6% | 53.7% |
| Aces / Match | 1.3 | 4.9 |
| Double Faults / Match | 4.3 | 2.2 |
| Break Points Saved % | 51.9% | 58.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 26.1% | 32.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 45.6% | 53.1% |
| BP Converted % | 46.8% | 41.4% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 16 | 20 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 30 | 19.9 |
| Net Pts Won % | 58.8% | 64.3% |
| Total Pts Won % | 44.9% | 52.1% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 25% | 69% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Kenny De Schepper and Andrey Rublev face off in the Round of 16 at Como on Clay.
Kenny De Schepper leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Kenny De Schepper is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Max Alcala Gurri (Jun 7).
Andrey Rublev is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Hubert Hurkacz (Jun 16).
Share this match
