WTA 1000 · Round of 64 · Indian Wells
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Bondarenko
⚙️ Grinder
Pavlyuchenkova
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 60% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 1,639 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Bondarenko | Pavlyuchenkova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 0–1 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.38 |
| ROI % | - | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | - | -1.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Bondarenko
0
Pavlyuchenkova
Jan 15, 2018
Australian Open
H Hard · Round of 64
Mar 7, 2016
Indian Wells
H Hard · Round of 64
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Bondarenko | Pavlyuchenkova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 57.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 50% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 50% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 4 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 2 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 50% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 24.4% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 61.9% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 16.7% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 42.4% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Kateryna Bondarenko and Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova face off in the Round of 64 at Indian Wells on Hard.
Kateryna Bondarenko leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Kateryna Bondarenko is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Lina Glushko (Aug 19).
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Alexandra Eala (Apr 21).
Share this match
