WTA 250 · Round of 32 · Moscow
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Baindl
⚙️ Grinder
Trevisan
🛡️ The Spoiler
Matchup analysis
The 🛡️ The Spoiler archetype wins about 53% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 808 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Martina Trevisan here.
The Spoiler players often use strong court coverage and strong retrieval to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Baindl | Trevisan |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 7–7 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.72 |
| ROI % | - | -22.4% |
| Units P/L | - | -3.14u |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Baindl
1
Trevisan
Jul 11, 2022
Budapest
C Clay · Round of 16
Jul 23, 2018
Moscow
C Clay · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Baindl | Trevisan |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 69.5% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 56.5% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 39.3% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0.5 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 5.4 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 48.3% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 45.2% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 62.1% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 46.2% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 51.2% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 56% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Kateryna Baindl and Martina Trevisan face off in the Round of 32 at Moscow on Clay.
Kateryna Baindl leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Kateryna Baindl is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Elisabetta Cocciaretto (Aug 26).
Martina Trevisan is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Taylor Townsend (Jun 20).
Share this match
