WTA 250 · Round of 32 · Tashkent
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Baindl
⚙️ Grinder
Begu
🎯 Baseliner
Matchup analysis
The 🎯 Baseliner archetype wins about 56% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 510 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Irina Camelia Begu here.
Baseliner players often use precise groundstrokes and court control to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Baindl | Begu |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 3–2 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.89 |
| ROI % | - | +40.4% |
| Units P/L | - | +2.02u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
2
Baindl
1
Begu
Sep 24, 2018
Tashkent
H Hard · Round of 32
Aug 28, 2017
US Open
H Hard · Round of 128
Sep 21, 2015
Seoul
H Hard · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Baindl | Begu |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 74.5% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 44.7% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 23.1% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 1 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 45.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 36.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 50% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 66.7% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 38.5% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Kateryna Baindl and Irina Camelia Begu face off in the Round of 32 at Tashkent on Hard.
Kateryna Baindl leads 2-1 over 3 previous meetings.
Kateryna Baindl is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Elisabetta Cocciaretto (Aug 26).
Irina Camelia Begu is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Karolina Muchova (Jun 24).
Share this match
