WTA 250 · Quarterfinals · Shenzhen
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Siniakova
🏹 Frontrunner
Pliskova
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
🏹 Frontrunner vs 🤖 Servebot is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 858 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Katerina Siniakova plays Kristyna Pliskova.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Siniakova | Pliskova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 8–7 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.99 | - |
| ROI % | -10.3% | - |
| Units P/L | -1.55u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
1
Siniakova
2
Pliskova
Jul 23, 2018
Moscow
C Clay · Round of 32
Apr 2, 2018
Charleston
C Clay · Round of 64
Jan 1, 2018
Shenzhen
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Siniakova | Pliskova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 62.5% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 64.7% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 51.5% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 1 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.7 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 71.9% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 43.4% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 55.3% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 49.5% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 53.7% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Katerina Siniakova and Kristyna Pliskova face off in the Quarterfinals at Shenzhen on Hard.
Katerina Siniakova leads 1-2 over 3 previous meetings.
Katerina Siniakova is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Liudmila Samsonova (Jun 21).
Kristyna Pliskova is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Marina Bassols Ribera (May 20).
Share this match
