WTA 250 · Round of 32 · Prague
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Pliskova
🤖 Servebot
Voegele
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 60% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 1,639 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Karolina Pliskova here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Pliskova | Voegele |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 11–5 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.05 | - |
| ROI % | +39.8% | - |
| Units P/L | +6.36u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Pliskova
0
Voegele
Apr 25, 2016
Prague
C Clay · Round of 32
Feb 23, 2015
Doha
H Hard · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Pliskova | Voegele |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 65.7% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 68.2% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 41.7% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 4.1 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 5.8 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 51.1% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 35% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 53.1% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 50.5% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 50.6% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 75% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Karolina Pliskova and Stefanie Voegele face off in the Round of 32 at Prague on Clay.
Karolina Pliskova leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Karolina Pliskova is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Marie Bouzkova (Jun 20).
Stefanie Voegele is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Sara Errani (Apr 4).
Share this match
