WTA 250 · Quarterfinals · Cluj-Napoca
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Pliskova
🤖 Servebot
Errani
🛡️ The Spoiler
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 59% vs 🛡️ The Spoiler across 512 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Karolina Pliskova here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the the spoiler's strong court coverage. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Pliskova | Errani |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 11–5 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.05 | - |
| ROI % | +39.8% | - |
| Units P/L | +6.36u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Pliskova
0
Errani
Feb 5, 2024
Cluj-Napoca
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Nov 2, 2015
Zhuhai
H Hard · Round Robin
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Pliskova | Errani |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 65.7% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 68.2% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 41.7% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 4.1 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 5.8 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 51.1% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 35% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 53.1% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 50.5% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 50.6% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Karolina Pliskova and Sara Errani face off in the Quarterfinals at Cluj-Napoca on Hard.
Karolina Pliskova leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Karolina Pliskova is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Marie Bouzkova (Jun 20).
Sara Errani is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Naomi Osaka (May 6).
Share this match
