WTA 1000 · Semifinals · Rome
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Pliskova
🤖 Servebot
Martic
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
Both Karolina Pliskova and Petra Martic are 🤖 Servebot types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit. Across 3,172 matches in our dataset, the historical split is about even.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Pliskova | Martic |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 8–3 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.14 | - |
| ROI % | +55.2% | - |
| Units P/L | +6.07u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 5 career meetings
3
Pliskova
2
Martic
Sep 19, 2022
Tokyo
H Hard · Round of 16
May 10, 2021
Rome
C Clay · Semifinals
Sep 9, 2019
Zhengzhou
H Hard · Final
May 27, 2019
Roland Garros
C Clay · Round of 32
Mar 18, 2019
Miami
H Hard · Round of 64
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Pliskova | Martic |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 65.7% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 68.2% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 41.7% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 4.1 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 5.8 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 51.1% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 35% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 53.1% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 50.5% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 50.6% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 75% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Karolina Pliskova and Petra Martic face off in the Semifinals at Rome on Clay.
Karolina Pliskova leads 3-2 over 5 previous meetings.
Karolina Pliskova is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Laura Siegemund (May 5).
Petra Martic is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Diane Parry (Jun 30).
Share this match
