WTA 1000 · Round of 32 · Rome
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Pliskova
🤖 Servebot
Strycova
🎯 Baseliner
Matchup analysis
🤖 Servebot vs 🎯 Baseliner is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 864 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Karolina Pliskova plays Barbora Strycova.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Pliskova | Strycova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 8–3 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.14 | - |
| ROI % | +55.2% | - |
| Units P/L | +6.07u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 6 career meetings
5
Pliskova
1
Strycova
Sep 14, 2020
Rome
C Clay · Round of 32
Jun 25, 2018
Eastbourne
G Grass · Round of 16
Jan 15, 2018
Australian Open
H Hard · Round of 16
Mar 20, 2017
Miami
H Hard · Round of 16
Jun 13, 2016
Birmingham
G Grass · Round of 32
Feb 16, 2015
Dubai
H Hard · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Pliskova | Strycova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 65.7% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 68.2% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 41.7% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 4.1 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 5.8 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 51.1% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 35% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 53.1% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 50.5% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 50.6% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 75% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Karolina Pliskova and Barbora Strycova face off in the Round of 32 at Rome on Clay.
Karolina Pliskova leads 5-1 over 6 previous meetings.
Karolina Pliskova is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Laura Siegemund (May 5).
Barbora Strycova is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Kaia Kanepi (Aug 28).
Share this match
