ATP Challenger Tour · Quarterfinals · Tashkent
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Majchrzak
🤖 Servebot
Safwat
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 58% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 5,936 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Kamil Majchrzak here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Majchrzak | Safwat |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 7–5 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.30 | - |
| ROI % | +22.2% | - |
| Units P/L | +2.66u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
3
Majchrzak
0
Safwat
Aug 5, 2021
Liberec
C Clay · Round of 16
May 8, 2018
Heilbronn
C Clay · Round of 32
Oct 12, 2017
Tashkent
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Majchrzak | Safwat |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 67.4% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 71.4% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 50% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 6.6 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.1 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 58.3% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 25.5% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 47.6% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 28.9% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 29.7 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 31.9 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 64.2% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 48.5% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Kamil Majchrzak and Mohamed Safwat face off in the Quarterfinals at Tashkent on Hard.
Kamil Majchrzak leads 3-0 over 3 previous meetings.
Kamil Majchrzak is 5-0 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Daniil Medvedev (Jun 13).
Mohamed Safwat is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Ivan Gretskiy (Sep 1).
Share this match
