ATP Challenger Tour · Quarterfinals · Ostrava
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Majchrzak
🤖 Servebot
Novak
🛡️ The Spoiler
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 63% vs 🛡️ The Spoiler across 1,609 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Kamil Majchrzak here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the the spoiler's strong court coverage. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Majchrzak | Novak |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 7–5 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.30 | - |
| ROI % | +22.2% | - |
| Units P/L | +2.66u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Majchrzak
1
Novak
Jun 19, 2019
Ilkley
G Grass · Semifinals
May 3, 2019
Ostrava
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Majchrzak | Novak |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 67.4% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 71.4% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 50% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 6.6 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.1 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 58.3% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 25.5% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 47.6% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 28.9% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 29.7 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 31.9 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 64.2% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 48.5% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 25% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Kamil Majchrzak and Dennis Novak face off in the Quarterfinals at Ostrava on Clay.
Kamil Majchrzak leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Kamil Majchrzak is 5-0 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Daniil Medvedev (Jun 13).
Dennis Novak is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Harry Wendelken (Oct 15).
Share this match
