WTA 500 · Round of 32 · Charleston
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Grabher
🪃 Counterpuncher
Vickery
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 53% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 5,392 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Sachia Vickery here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Grabher | Vickery |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 9–7 | 1–0 |
| Avg odds | 2.28 | 4.85 |
| ROI % | +25.4% | +385.0% |
| Units P/L | +4.06u | +3.85u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Grabher
0
Vickery
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Grabher | Vickery |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 62.4% | 64.1% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 55.9% | 40% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 42.2% | 28.6% |
| Aces / Match | 1.3 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 5.1 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 48.4% | 54.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 37.8% | 17.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 51% | 40% |
| BP Converted % | 43.2% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 46.7% | 32.4% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 63% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Julia Grabher and Sachia Vickery face off in the Round of 32 at Charleston on Clay.
Julia Grabher leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Julia Grabher is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Mariam Bolkvadze (Jun 23).
Sachia Vickery is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Beatriz Haddad Maia (Jun 15).
Share this match
