WTA 1000 · Round of 64 · Rome
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Grabher
⚙️ Grinder
Teichmann
🛡️ The Spoiler
Matchup analysis
⚙️ Grinder vs 🛡️ The Spoiler is historically tight (50% vs 50%, 298 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Julia Grabher plays Jil Teichmann.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Grabher | Teichmann |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–1 | - |
| Avg odds | 3.93 | - |
| ROI % | +167.0% | - |
| Units P/L | +3.34u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
2
Grabher
1
Teichmann
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Teichmann has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Grabher's 0%).
| Opponent | Grabher | Teichmann |
|---|---|---|
| Alycia Parks | L 67 26 | W 63 64 |
| Lois Boisson | L 16 36 | W 64 16 64 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Grabher | Teichmann |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 59.1% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 56.6% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 46.2% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 2.3 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.7 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 42.3% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 31.4% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 54.7% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 38.7% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 46.5% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 33% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Julia Grabher and Jil Teichmann face off in the Round of 64 at Rome on Clay.
Julia Grabher leads 2-1 over 3 previous meetings.
Julia Grabher is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Jil Teichmann (May 18).
Jil Teichmann is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Petra Marcinko (May 18).
Share this match
