WTA 250 · Quarterfinals · Auckland
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Goerges
🤖 Servebot
Hibino
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 54% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 2,124 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Julia Goerges here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Goerges | Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 5–7 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.01 |
| ROI % | - | -36.1% |
| Units P/L | - | -4.33u |
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
3
Goerges
0
Hibino
May 22, 2017
Nurnberg
C Clay · Round of 32
Mar 21, 2016
Miami
H Hard · Round of 128
Jan 4, 2016
Auckland
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Goerges | Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 69% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 54% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 38.4% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 1.2 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 2.5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 51.8% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 37% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 59% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 40% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 45.9% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 25% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Julia Goerges and Nao Hibino face off in the Quarterfinals at Auckland on Hard.
Julia Goerges leads 3-0 over 3 previous meetings.
Julia Goerges is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Laura Siegemund (Sep 28).
Nao Hibino is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Darja Semenistaja (Jun 24).
Share this match
