ATP Challenger Tour · Quarterfinals · Poprad Tatry
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Kovalik
⚙️ Grinder
Safwat
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
Both Jozef Kovalik and Mohamed Safwat are ⚙️ Grinder types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit. Across 4,528 matches in our dataset, the historical split is about even.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Kovalik | Safwat |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.07 | - |
| ROI % | -100.0% | - |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Kovalik
0
Safwat
Jun 16, 2018
Poprad Tatry
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Jun 10, 2016
Poprad Tatry
C Clay · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Kovalik | Safwat |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 59.2% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 59.5% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 43.8% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 1 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 35% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 27% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 42.3% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 50% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 42.5% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Jozef Kovalik and Mohamed Safwat face off in the Quarterfinals at Poprad Tatry on Clay.
Jozef Kovalik leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Jozef Kovalik is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Dimitar Kuzmanov (Jun 19).
Mohamed Safwat is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Ivan Gretskiy (Sep 1).
Share this match
