WTA 1000 · Round of 128 · Miami
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Larsson
⚙️ Grinder
Siniakova
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The 🪃 Counterpuncher archetype wins about 65% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 793 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Katerina Siniakova here.
Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Larsson | Siniakova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 2–2 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.57 |
| ROI % | - | -30.5% |
| Units P/L | - | -1.22u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 5 career meetings
2
Larsson
3
Siniakova
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Larsson | Siniakova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 62.9% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 63.2% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 48.2% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 1.3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 4 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 67% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 40.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 54.7% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 41.7% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 51.5% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 75% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Johanna Larsson and Katerina Siniakova face off in the Round of 128 at Miami on Hard.
Johanna Larsson leads 2-3 over 5 previous meetings.
Johanna Larsson is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Magda Linette (Feb 8).
Katerina Siniakova is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Marie Bouzkova (May 17).
Share this match
