WTA 1000 · Round of 64 · Cincinnati
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Larsson
⚙️ Grinder
Begu
🎯 Baseliner
Matchup analysis
The 🎯 Baseliner archetype wins about 54% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 495 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Irina Camelia Begu here.
Baseliner players often use precise groundstrokes and court control to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Larsson | Begu |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 2–1 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.59 |
| ROI % | - | +6.0% |
| Units P/L | - | +0.18u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 4 career meetings
2
Larsson
2
Begu
May 8, 2017
Madrid
C Clay · Round of 32
Aug 15, 2016
Cincinnati
H Hard · Round of 64
Jan 18, 2016
Australian Open
H Hard · Round of 128
Sep 21, 2015
Seoul
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Larsson | Begu |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 74.5% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 44.7% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 23.1% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 1 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 45.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 36.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 50% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 66.7% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 38.5% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Johanna Larsson and Irina Camelia Begu face off in the Round of 64 at Cincinnati on Hard.
Johanna Larsson leads 2-2 over 4 previous meetings.
Johanna Larsson is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Magda Linette (Feb 8).
Irina Camelia Begu is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Diane Parry (Jun 21).
Share this match
