WTA 1000 · Round of 16 · Beijing
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Konta
🤖 Servebot
Pliskova
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
Both Johanna Konta and Karolina Pliskova are 🤖 Servebot types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit. Across 3,172 matches in our dataset, the historical split is about even.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Konta | Pliskova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 8–3 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.14 |
| ROI % | - | +55.2% |
| Units P/L | - | +6.07u |
Prior meetings and scores · 6 career meetings
2
Konta
4
Pliskova
Aug 26, 2019
Us Open
H Hard · Round of 16
May 13, 2019
Rome
C Clay · Final
Oct 3, 2016
Beijing
H Hard · Round of 16
Jun 20, 2016
Eastbourne
G Grass · Semifinals
Mar 7, 2016
Indian Wells
H Hard · Round of 16
Jun 15, 2015
Birmingham
G Grass · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Konta | Pliskova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 65.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 68.2% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 41.7% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 4.1 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 5.8 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 51.1% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 35% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 53.1% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 50.5% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 50.6% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Johanna Konta and Karolina Pliskova face off in the Round of 16 at Beijing on Hard.
Johanna Konta leads 2-4 over 6 previous meetings.
Johanna Konta is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Karolina Muchova (Aug 16).
Karolina Pliskova is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Laura Siegemund (May 5).
Share this match
