WTA 500 · Round of 32 · Adelaide
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Teichmann
🎯 Baseliner
Mladenovic
🏃 Pusher
Matchup analysis
The 🎯 Baseliner archetype wins about 64% vs 🏃 Pusher across 154 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Jil Teichmann here.
Baseliner players often use precise groundstrokes and court control to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Teichmann | Mladenovic |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 13–5 | 0–1 |
| Avg odds | 3.44 | 1.35 |
| ROI % | +123.4% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | +22.21u | -1.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Teichmann
0
Mladenovic
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Teichmann | Mladenovic |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 67.7% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 58.1% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 51.3% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0.3 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.5 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 52.5% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 37.6% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 57.3% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 43.6% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 51.6% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 67% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Jil Teichmann and Kristina Mladenovic face off in the Round of 32 at Adelaide on Hard.
Jil Teichmann leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Jil Teichmann is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Bianca Andreescu (Jun 24).
Kristina Mladenovic is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Valentina Ryser (Jun 16).
Share this match
