WTA 1000 · Round of 32 · Rome
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Teichmann
🎯 Baseliner
Pliskova
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
🎯 Baseliner vs 🤖 Servebot is historically tight (49% vs 51%, 916 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Jil Teichmann plays Karolina Pliskova.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Teichmann | Pliskova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 13–5 | 11–5 |
| Avg odds | 3.44 | 2.05 |
| ROI % | +123.4% | +39.8% |
| Units P/L | +22.21u | +6.36u |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Teichmann
0
Pliskova
May 9, 2022
Rome
C Clay · Round of 32
Aug 16, 2021
Cincinnati
H Hard · Semifinals
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Pliskova has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Teichmann's 0%).
| Opponent | Teichmann | Pliskova |
|---|---|---|
| Caty Mcnally | L 26 26 | W |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Teichmann | Pliskova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 67.7% | 65.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 58.1% | 68.2% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 51.3% | 41.7% |
| Aces / Match | 0.3 | 4.1 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.5 | 5.8 |
| Break Points Saved % | 52.5% | 51.1% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 37.6% | 35% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 57.3% | 53.1% |
| BP Converted % | 43.6% | 50.5% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 51.6% | 50.6% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 79% | 75% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Jil Teichmann and Karolina Pliskova face off in the Round of 32 at Rome on Clay.
Jil Teichmann leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Jil Teichmann is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Bianca Andreescu (Jun 24).
Karolina Pliskova is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Marie Bouzkova (Jun 20).
Share this match
