WTA 1000 Β· Round of 64 Β· Cincinnati
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Teichmann
π― Baseliner
Collins
π₯ Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
π― Baseliner vs π₯ Big Hitter is historically tight (49% vs 51%, 1,030 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Jil Teichmann plays Danielle Collins.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Teichmann | Collins |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 13β5 | - |
| Avg odds | 3.44 | - |
| ROI % | +123.4% | - |
| Units P/L | +22.21u | - |
Prior meetings and scores Β· 3 career meetings
1
Teichmann
2
Collins
Jan 9, 2023
Adelaide 2
H Hard Β· Round of 16
Aug 9, 2021
Montreal
H Hard Β· Round of 64
Aug 24, 2020
Cincinnati
H Hard Β· Round of 64
Serve and return comparison Β· Last 90 days
| Stat | Teichmann | Collins |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 67.7% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 58.1% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 51.3% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0.3 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.5 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 52.5% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 37.6% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 57.3% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 43.6% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 51.6% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 67% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Jil Teichmann and Danielle Collins face off in the Round of 64 at Cincinnati on Hard.
Jil Teichmann leads 1-2 over 3 previous meetings.
Jil Teichmann is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Bianca Andreescu (Jun 24).
Danielle Collins is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Jaqueline Cristian (Aug 25).
Share this match