WTA 1000 · Round of 128 · Indian Wells
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Teichmann
🎯 Baseliner
Krueger
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
🎯 Baseliner vs 🤖 Servebot is historically tight (49% vs 51%, 916 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Jil Teichmann plays Ashlyn Krueger.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Teichmann | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 13–5 | 10–5 |
| Avg odds | 3.44 | 1.66 |
| ROI % | +123.4% | +8.0% |
| Units P/L | +22.21u | +1.20u |
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Teichmann
0
Krueger
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Krueger has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Teichmann's 33%).
| Opponent | Teichmann | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Darja Vidmanova | L | W |
| Liudmila Samsonova | W 64 64 | W 36 75 62 |
| Caty Mcnally | L 26 26 | W 64 16 63 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Teichmann | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 67.7% | 64.6% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 58.1% | 61.7% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 51.3% | 42.5% |
| Aces / Match | 0.3 | 4.7 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.5 | 4.7 |
| Break Points Saved % | 52.5% | 44% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 37.6% | 34.7% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 57.3% | 55.3% |
| BP Converted % | 43.6% | 50% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 51.6% | 48.5% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 67% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Jil Teichmann and Ashlyn Krueger face off in the Round of 128 at Indian Wells on Hard.
Jil Teichmann leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Jil Teichmann is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Bianca Andreescu (Jun 24).
Ashlyn Krueger is 5-0 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Polina Iatcenko (Jun 25).
Share this match
