WTA 250 · Round of 32 · Lexington
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Brady
🤖 Servebot
Watson
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
Both Jennifer Brady and Heather Watson are 🤖 Servebot types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit. Across 3,240 matches in our dataset, the historical split is about even.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Brady | Watson |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | 3–2 |
| Avg odds | 2.19 | 1.87 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | +9.6% |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | +0.48u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Brady
0
Watson
Aug 10, 2020
Lexington
H Hard · Round of 32
Jan 16, 2017
Australian Open
H Hard · Round of 64
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Brady | Watson |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 57.5% | 60% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 71.2% | 57.6% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 50.6% | 50% |
| Aces / Match | 1.5 | 1 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3 | 2 |
| Break Points Saved % | 62.5% | 33.3% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 29.2% | 37.2% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 27.5% | 44.4% |
| BP Converted % | 25% | 25% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 47.8% | 45.9% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Jennifer Brady and Heather Watson face off in the Round of 32 at Lexington on Hard.
Jennifer Brady leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Jennifer Brady is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Gina Feistel (Apr 20).
Heather Watson is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Maria Timofeeva (Jun 25).
Share this match
