WTA 250 · Round of 16 · Guangzhou
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Brady
🤖 Servebot
Kovinic
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
🤖 Servebot vs 💥 Big Hitter is historically tight (49% vs 51%, 4,452 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Jennifer Brady plays Danka Kovinic.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Brady | Kovinic |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | 0–3 |
| Avg odds | 2.19 | 6.78 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | -3.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Brady
0
Kovinic
Jul 3, 2017
Wimbledon
G Grass · Round of 128
Sep 19, 2016
Guangzhou
H Hard · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Brady | Kovinic |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 57.5% | 53.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 71.2% | 44.8% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 50.6% | 28% |
| Aces / Match | 1.5 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3 | 9 |
| Break Points Saved % | 62.5% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 29.2% | 44.9% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 27.5% | 33.3% |
| BP Converted % | 25% | 42.9% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 47.8% | 40.4% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Jennifer Brady and Danka Kovinic face off in the Round of 16 at Guangzhou on Hard.
Jennifer Brady leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Jennifer Brady is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Gina Feistel (Apr 20).
Danka Kovinic is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Miriam Bianca Bulgaru (Jun 16).
Share this match
