WTA 250 Β· Round of 16 Β· Guangzhou
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Brady
π€ Servebot
Kovinic
π₯ Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
π€ Servebot vs π₯ Big Hitter is historically tight (49% vs 51%, 4,452 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Jennifer Brady plays Danka Kovinic.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Brady | Kovinic |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0β1 | 0β3 |
| Avg odds | 2.19 | 6.78 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | -3.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores Β· 2 career meetings
2
Brady
0
Kovinic
Jul 3, 2017
Wimbledon
G Grass Β· Round of 128
Sep 19, 2016
Guangzhou
H Hard Β· Round of 16
Serve and return comparison Β· Last 90 days
| Stat | Brady | Kovinic |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 57.5% | 53.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 71.2% | 44.8% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 50.6% | 28% |
| Aces / Match | 1.5 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3 | 9 |
| Break Points Saved % | 62.5% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 29.2% | 44.9% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 27.5% | 33.3% |
| BP Converted % | 25% | 42.9% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 47.8% | 40.4% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Jennifer Brady and Danka Kovinic face off in the Round of 16 at Guangzhou on Hard.
Jennifer Brady leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Jennifer Brady is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Gina Feistel (Apr 20).
Danka Kovinic is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Miriam Bianca Bulgaru (Jun 16).
Share this match