WTA 250 · Round of 32 · Prague
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Brady
🤖 Servebot
Collins
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
🤖 Servebot vs 💥 Big Hitter is historically tight (49% vs 51%, 4,452 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Jennifer Brady plays Danielle Collins.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Brady | Collins |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.19 | - |
| ROI % | -100.0% | - |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Brady
0
Collins
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Collins has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Brady's 0%).
| Opponent | Brady | Collins |
|---|---|---|
| Viktoriya Tomova | L 46 36 | W 63 75 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Brady | Collins |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 57.5% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 71.2% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 50.6% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 1.5 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 62.5% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 29.2% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 27.5% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 25% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 47.8% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Jennifer Brady and Danielle Collins face off in the Round of 32 at Prague on Clay.
Jennifer Brady leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Jennifer Brady is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Gina Feistel (Apr 20).
Danielle Collins is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Jaqueline Cristian (Aug 25).
Share this match
