WTA 1000 · Round of 64 · Beijing
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Brady
🤖 Servebot
Anisimova
👑 The Complete Package
Matchup analysis
The 👑 The Complete Package archetype wins about 59% vs 🤖 Servebot across 2,242 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Amanda Anisimova here.
The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the servebot's high ace rate. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Brady | Anisimova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | 1–3 |
| Avg odds | 2.19 | 1.91 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | -10.3% |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | -0.41u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Brady
0
Anisimova
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Brady | Anisimova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 57.5% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 71.2% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 50.6% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 1.5 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 62.5% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 29.2% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 27.5% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 25% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 47.8% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Jennifer Brady and Amanda Anisimova face off in the Round of 64 at Beijing on Hard.
Jennifer Brady leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Jennifer Brady is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Gina Feistel (Apr 20).
Amanda Anisimova is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Iva Jovic (Jun 12).
Share this match
