WTA 1000 · Round of 32 · Rome
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Ostapenko
👑 The Complete Package
Puig
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
The 👑 The Complete Package archetype wins about 56% vs 💥 Big Hitter across 4,219 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Jelena Ostapenko here.
The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the big hitter's power groundstrokes. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Ostapenko | Puig |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 11–6 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.76 | - |
| ROI % | +0.7% | - |
| Units P/L | +0.11u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
3
Ostapenko
0
Puig
Sep 25, 2017
Wuhan
H Hard · Round of 16
May 29, 2017
Roland Garros
C Clay · Round of 64
May 9, 2016
Rome
C Clay · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Ostapenko | Puig |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 58.4% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 66.2% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 43.9% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 4 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 7.1 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 58.9% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 41.6% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 61.1% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 56.1% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 53% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 56% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Jelena Ostapenko and Monica Puig face off in the Round of 32 at Rome on Clay.
Jelena Ostapenko leads 3-0 over 3 previous meetings.
Jelena Ostapenko is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Zeynep Sonmez (Jun 25).
Monica Puig is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Danielle Collins (Apr 28).
Share this match
