WTA 1000 · Round of 64 · Rome
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Ostapenko
👑 The Complete Package
Mladenovic
🏃 Pusher
Matchup analysis
The 👑 The Complete Package archetype wins about 80% vs 🏃 Pusher across 910 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Jelena Ostapenko here.
The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Ostapenko | Mladenovic |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 11–6 | 0–1 |
| Avg odds | 1.76 | 1.35 |
| ROI % | +0.7% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | +0.11u | -1.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
2
Ostapenko
1
Mladenovic
Jan 28, 2019
St. Petersburg
H Hard · Round of 32
May 9, 2016
Rome
C Clay · Round of 64
Jun 29, 2015
Wimbledon
G Grass · Round of 64
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Ostapenko | Mladenovic |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 58.4% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 66.2% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 43.9% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 4 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 7.1 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 58.9% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 41.6% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 61.1% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 56.1% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 53% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 56% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Jelena Ostapenko and Kristina Mladenovic face off in the Round of 64 at Rome on Clay.
Jelena Ostapenko leads 2-1 over 3 previous meetings.
Jelena Ostapenko is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Zeynep Sonmez (Jun 25).
Kristina Mladenovic is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Valentina Ryser (Jun 16).
Share this match
