WTA 250 · Round of 32 · Seoul
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Ostapenko
👑 The Complete Package
Larsson
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 👑 The Complete Package archetype wins about 67% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 1,444 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Jelena Ostapenko here.
The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Ostapenko | Larsson |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 11–6 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.76 | - |
| ROI % | +0.7% | - |
| Units P/L | +0.11u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
3
Ostapenko
0
Larsson
Apr 1, 2019
Charleston
C Clay · Round of 64
Sep 18, 2017
Seoul
H Hard · Round of 32
Jan 4, 2016
Auckland
H Hard · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Ostapenko | Larsson |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 58.4% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 66.2% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 43.9% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 4 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 7.1 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 58.9% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 41.6% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 61.1% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 56.1% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 53% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Jelena Ostapenko and Johanna Larsson face off in the Round of 32 at Seoul on Hard.
Jelena Ostapenko leads 3-0 over 3 previous meetings.
Jelena Ostapenko is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Zeynep Sonmez (Jun 25).
Johanna Larsson is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Magda Linette (Feb 8).
Share this match
