WTA 250 · Quarterfinals · Prague
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Ostapenko
👑 The Complete Package
Konjuh
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
The 👑 The Complete Package archetype wins about 56% vs 💥 Big Hitter across 4,219 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Jelena Ostapenko here.
The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the big hitter's power groundstrokes. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Ostapenko | Konjuh |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 11–6 | 0–2 |
| Avg odds | 1.76 | 1.64 |
| ROI % | +0.7% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | +0.11u | -2.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Ostapenko
1
Konjuh
May 1, 2017
Prague
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Apr 25, 2016
Prague
C Clay · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Ostapenko | Konjuh |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 58.4% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 66.2% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 43.9% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 4 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 7.1 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 58.9% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 41.6% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 61.1% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 56.1% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 53% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 56% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Jelena Ostapenko and Ana Konjuh face off in the Quarterfinals at Prague on Clay.
Jelena Ostapenko leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Jelena Ostapenko is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Zeynep Sonmez (Jun 25).
Ana Konjuh is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Gina Marie Dittmann (Jun 9).
Share this match
