ATP Challenger Tour · Quarterfinals · Antalya 2
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Munar
🎯 Baseliner
Kovalik
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 🎯 Baseliner archetype wins about 56% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 2,130 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Jaume Munar here.
Baseliner players often use precise groundstrokes and court control to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Munar | Kovalik |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 4–7 | 0–1 |
| Avg odds | 2.00 | 2.07 |
| ROI % | -47.1% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | -5.18u | -1.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 4 career meetings
2
Munar
2
Kovalik
Jul 26, 2021
Kitzbuhel
C Clay · Round of 32
Feb 5, 2021
Antalya 2
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Nov 7, 2019
Montevideo
C Clay · Round of 16
Oct 7, 2015
Mohammedia
C Clay · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Munar | Kovalik |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 63.4% | 59.2% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 68.7% | 59.5% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 52% | 43.8% |
| Aces / Match | 2.7 | 1 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.1 | 3 |
| Break Points Saved % | 63.2% | 35% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 29.4% | 27% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 57.3% | 42.3% |
| BP Converted % | 33.4% | 50% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 22.1 | 18 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 25 | 33 |
| Net Pts Won % | 70.6% | 25% |
| Total Pts Won % | 51% | 42.5% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 40% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Jaume Munar and Jozef Kovalik face off in the Quarterfinals at Antalya 2 on Clay.
Jaume Munar leads 2-2 over 4 previous meetings.
Jaume Munar is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Martin Damm (Jun 9).
Jozef Kovalik is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Dimitar Kuzmanov (Jun 19).
Share this match
