ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 16 · Bad Waltersdorf
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Munar
🎯 Baseliner
Novak
🛡️ The Spoiler
Matchup analysis
The 🎯 Baseliner archetype wins about 59% vs 🛡️ The Spoiler across 671 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Jaume Munar here.
Baseliner players often use precise groundstrokes and court control to pressure the the spoiler's strong court coverage. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Munar | Novak |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 4–8 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.12 | - |
| ROI % | -49.8% | - |
| Units P/L | -5.98u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Munar
0
Novak
Sep 19, 2024
Bad Waltersdorf
C Clay · Round of 16
Jun 14, 2018
Caltanissetta
C Clay · Semifinals
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Munar | Novak |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 63.4% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 68.7% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 52% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 2.7 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.1 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 63.2% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 29.4% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 57.3% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 33.4% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 19.4 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 21.6 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 72.7% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 51% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 40% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Jaume Munar and Dennis Novak face off in the Round of 16 at Bad Waltersdorf on Clay.
Jaume Munar leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Jaume Munar is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Zizou Bergs (Jun 22).
Dennis Novak is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Harry Wendelken (Oct 15).
Share this match
