Grand Slam · Round of 128 · Australian Open
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Munar
🎾 All-Court
Shevchenko
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 54% vs 🎾 All-Court across 1,158 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Alexander Shevchenko here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the all-court's tactical versatility. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Munar | Shevchenko |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 3–3 | 8–10 |
| Avg odds | 2.31 | 2.60 |
| ROI % | -14.3% | +2.4% |
| Units P/L | -0.86u | +0.44u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
3
Munar
0
Shevchenko
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Munar has a higher win rate against shared opponents (40% vs Shevchenko's 20%).
| Opponent | Munar | Shevchenko |
|---|---|---|
| Casper Ruud | L 06 16 | L 16 67 |
| Marin Cilic | L 36 63 26 46 | L 16 36 |
| Ben Shelton | W 63 64 | W 67 76 63 |
| Karen Khachanov | W 76 36 63 | L 76 26 36 |
| Quentin Halys | L 64 36 67 | L 67 57 |
| Alexander Bublik | L 46 76 67 | L 46 26 |
| Marton Fucsovics | W 46 75 61 | W 63 76 |
| Yoshihito Nishioka | W 64 57 61 | L 16 26 |
| Lorenzo Musetti | L 36 06 16 | L 36 16 |
| Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | L 46 26 | L 16 16 26 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Munar | Shevchenko |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 62.8% | 62.5% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 74.4% | 72.9% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 61.7% | 53.4% |
| Aces / Match | 4 | 7.7 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.3 | 1.7 |
| Break Points Saved % | 67.4% | 59.4% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 30.4% | 30% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 52.3% | 47.4% |
| BP Converted % | 48.9% | 25.8% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 29 | 28.9 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 28 | 29.7 |
| Net Pts Won % | 75.7% | 71.7% |
| Total Pts Won % | 54.7% | 50.5% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 67% | 50% |
Last five matches per player
Casper Ruud
Mutua Madrid Open · Round of 64
Apr 25
Aleksandr Shevchenko
Mutua Madrid Open · Round of 128
Apr 23
Rafael Jodar
Barcelona Open Banc Sabadell · Round of 32
Apr 13
Alexander Bublik
ABN AMRO Open · Quarterfinals
Feb 13
Karen Khachanov
ABN AMRO Open · Round of 16
Feb 12
Dan Added
Open Aix Provence Crédit Agricole · Round of 32
Apr 28
Jaume Munar
Mutua Madrid Open · Round of 128
Apr 23
Diego Dedura
BMW Open by Bitpanda · 1st Round Qualifying
Apr 11
Marin Cilic
Rolex Monte-Carlo Masters · Round of 64
Apr 7
Roberto Bautista Agut
Rolex Monte-Carlo Masters · 2nd Round Qualifying
Apr 5
Match summary
Jaume Munar and Alexander Shevchenko will meet in the Round of 128 at the Mutua Madrid Open on April 22, 2026. The 38th-ranked Munar takes on 82nd-ranked Shevchenko on the outdoor clay courts in Madrid. This clay-court meeting marks an important early-round test for both players at one of the tour's premier spring events.
Jaume Munar leads the head-to-head series 2-0 after two previous meetings. The two players have competed before on tour, with Munar winning both encounters. Their history suggests familiarity, though the clay surface at Madrid may introduce different dynamics into their matchup.
Jaume Munar arrives with mixed recent form, winning 2 of his last 5 matches and holding a 50 percent win rate on clay over his last 10 outings. Alexander Shevchenko has won 2 of his last 5 matches as well, posting a 55 percent clay record in the same span. Both players enter the tournament coming off losses, with Munar's current streak standing at three consecutive defeats and Shevchenko at two losses in a row.
Munar plays as a counterpuncher who retrieves well and constructs points methodically from the baseline. Shevchenko relies on powerful striking and aggressive shot-making to control rallies. On clay, Munar has compiled a 10-10 record while Shevchenko stands at 11-9, indicating both players possess familiarity with the slower surface. Their contrasting approaches should create an interesting tactical contest on the Madrid clay.
Share this match
