ATP Challenger Tour · Quarterfinals · Samarkand
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Jung
⚙️ Grinder
Vatutin
⚔️ The Gladiator
Matchup analysis
⚙️ Grinder vs ⚔️ The Gladiator is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 2,579 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Jason Jung plays Alexey Vatutin.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Jung | Vatutin |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–5 | - |
| Avg odds | 3.41 | - |
| ROI % | -100.0% | - |
| Units P/L | -5.00u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
2
Jung
1
Vatutin
Nov 9, 2019
Houston
H Hard · Round of 16
Jan 1, 2018
Australian Open
H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying
May 14, 2017
Samarkand
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Jung | Vatutin |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 67.9% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 65.2% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 40% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 3.5 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 52.1% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 31.9% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 50.7% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 58.5% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 13 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 22.5 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 62.5% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 48% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Jason Jung and Alexey Vatutin face off in the Quarterfinals at Samarkand on Clay.
Jason Jung leads 2-1 over 3 previous meetings.
Jason Jung is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Zdenek Kolar (Jun 9).
Alexey Vatutin is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Andrej Martin (Nov 28).
Share this match
