ATP Masters 1000 · Final · Mutua Madrid Open
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Sinner
👑 The Complete Package
Zverev
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
👑 The Complete Package vs 🤖 Servebot is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 1,542 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Jannik Sinner plays Alexander Zverev.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Sinner | Zverev |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 20–1 | 22–5 |
| Avg odds | 1.14 | 1.53 |
| ROI % | +9.3% | -0.3% |
| Units P/L | +1.95u | -0.08u |
Prior meetings and scores · 14 career meetings
10
Sinner
4
Zverev
May 3, 2026
Mutua Madrid Open
C Clay · Final
Apr 11, 2026
Rolex Monte-Carlo Masters
C Clay · Semifinals
Mar 24, 2026
Miami Open presented by Itau
H Hard · Semifinals
Mar 13, 2026
BNP Paribas Open
H Hard · Semifinals
Nov 12, 2025
Nitto ATP Finals
H Hard · Round Robin
Nov 1, 2025
ATP Masters 1000 Paris
H Hard · Semifinals
Oct 26, 2025
Vienna
H Hard · Finals
Jan 26, 2025
Australian Open
H Hard · Finals
Aug 18, 2024
ATP Masters 1000 Cincinnati
H Hard · Semifinals
Sep 4, 2023
US Open
H Hard · Round of 16
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 10 shared opponents, both Sinner and Zverev posted a 90% win rate.
| Opponent | Sinner | Zverev |
|---|---|---|
| Vit Kopriva | W 61 61 62 | W 63 46 62 |
| Flavio Cobolli | W 62 76 | W 61 46 64 67 61 |
| Jakub Mensik | L 67 62 36 | W 75 62 36 63 |
| Rafael Jodar | W 62 76 | W 76 61 63 |
| Tomas Machac | W 61 67 63 | W 64 62 62 |
| Benjamin Bonzi | W 67 61 64 | W 63 64 62 |
| Daniil Medvedev | W 62 57 64 | W 26 63 76 |
| Luciano Darderi | W 61 63 76 | L 61 67 06 |
| Alexei Popyrin | W 62 60 | W 67 64 63 |
| Daniel Altmaier | W 60 62 | W 75 63 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Sinner | Zverev |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 61.9% | 68.4% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 72.2% | 71.9% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 57.6% | 53.2% |
| Aces / Match | 4.7 | 5.7 |
| Double Faults / Match | 1.9 | 2.6 |
| Break Points Saved % | 42.6% | 50.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 32% | 30.7% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 50.2% | 48.5% |
| BP Converted % | 36.4% | 46.5% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 20 | 20.4 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 21.2 | 24.9 |
| Net Pts Won % | 69.9% | 70.3% |
| Total Pts Won % | 52.7% | 51% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 95% | 83% |
Last five matches per player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Roland Garros · Round of 64
May 27
Clement Tabur
Roland Garros · Round of 128
May 26
Casper Ruud
Internazionali BNL d'Italia · Final
May 17
Daniil Medvedev
Internazionali BNL d'Italia · Semifinals
May 16
Andrey Rublev
Internazionali BNL d'Italia · Quarterfinals
May 14
Match summary
Jannik Sinner and Alexander Zverev meet in the final of the Mutua Madrid Open on May 3 on outdoor clay, with the world number one facing the third-ranked German. Both players have thrived on the surface in recent matches; Sinner holds a 18-2 record on clay over his sample period, while Zverev stands at 16-4. Sinner won five consecutive matches over the last two weeks and has extended his current winning streak to 22 straight.
The head-to-head record tilts decisively toward Sinner, who leads 9-4 in their 13 meetings. Zverev has won just one of their last three encounters. Both players arrive fresh, having played their semifinal matches two days ago, though Sinner has maintained a perfect record in his last ten outings while Zverev dropped one match in his last ten.
Both Sinner and Zverev rely on aggressive baseline power and depth to control points, forcing errors from opponents rather than constructing elaborate rallies. On clay, Sinner's heavy topspin and movement have produced a 90% win rate; Zverev's flat striking and court coverage sit at 80%. The surface will reward whoever can sustain pressure across the baseline while managing the slower conditions that clay imposes on their heavy shot-making.
Share this match