WTA 250 · Final · Chennai
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Tjen
🤖 Servebot
Birrell
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
🤖 Servebot vs 💥 Big Hitter is historically tight (48% vs 52%, 4,362 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Janice Tjen plays Kimberly Birrell.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Tjen | Birrell |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 3–10 | 6–6 |
| Avg odds | 2.78 | 6.18 |
| ROI % | -52.1% | +402.3% |
| Units P/L | -6.77u | +48.28u |
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Tjen
0
Birrell
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Birrell has a higher win rate against shared opponents (80% vs Tjen's 0%).
| Opponent | Tjen | Birrell |
|---|---|---|
| Peyton Stearns | L 46 46 | W |
| Tatjana Maria | L | W 64 36 75 |
| Jaqueline Cristian | L 64 46 67 | W 57 61 75 |
| Petra Marcinko | L 67 63 46 | W 06 63 64 |
| Amanda Anisimova | L 16 36 | L 16 36 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Tjen | Birrell |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 62.7% | 77% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 61.2% | 49.1% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 38.9% | 41.2% |
| Aces / Match | 2.2 | 3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.2 | 4 |
| Break Points Saved % | 49.3% | 12.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 31% | 50% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 61.3% | 52.5% |
| BP Converted % | 33.7% | 50% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 47.5% | 49.4% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Janice Tjen and Kimberly Birrell face off in the Final at Chennai on Hard.
Janice Tjen leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Janice Tjen is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Tatjana Maria (Jun 15).
Kimberly Birrell is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Peyton Stearns (Jun 21).
Share this match
