ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 32 · Cleveland
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Duckworth
🤖 Servebot
Kodat
🛡️ The Spoiler
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 63% vs 🛡️ The Spoiler across 1,609 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for James Duckworth here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the the spoiler's strong court coverage. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Duckworth | Kodat |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 11–7 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.47 | - |
| ROI % | -11.1% | - |
| Units P/L | -1.99u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Duckworth
0
Kodat
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 1 shared opponent, both Duckworth and Kodat posted a 100% win rate.
| Opponent | Duckworth | Kodat |
|---|---|---|
| Hayato Matsuoka | W 61 64 | W 26 63 63 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Duckworth | Kodat |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 57.5% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 75.9% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 59.3% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 7.1 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.3 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 71.8% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 27.6% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 48.5% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 43.5% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 27 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 35.6 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 72.4% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 53.2% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
James Duckworth and Toby Kodat face off in the Round of 32 at Cleveland on Hard.
James Duckworth leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
James Duckworth is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Giles Hussey (Jun 20).
Toby Kodat is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Hayato Matsuoka (Aug 3).
Share this match
