ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 32 · Bengaluru
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Duckworth
🤖 Servebot
Sultanov
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 58% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 5,936 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for James Duckworth here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Duckworth | Sultanov |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 11–7 | 3–1 |
| Avg odds | 2.47 | 1.54 |
| ROI % | -11.1% | -2.5% |
| Units P/L | -1.99u | -0.10u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Duckworth
0
Sultanov
Jun 8, 2024
Stuttgart
G Grass · 1st Round Qualifying
Feb 7, 2020
Bengaluru
H Hard · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Duckworth | Sultanov |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 57.5% | 58.6% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 75.9% | 75.4% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 59.3% | 53.6% |
| Aces / Match | 7.1 | 9.8 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.3 | 1.3 |
| Break Points Saved % | 71.8% | 64.6% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 27.6% | 21.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 48.5% | 41.3% |
| BP Converted % | 43.5% | 10% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 27 | 21 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 35.6 | 10 |
| Net Pts Won % | 72.4% | 100% |
| Total Pts Won % | 53.2% | 47% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
James Duckworth and Khumoyun Sultanov face off in the Round of 32 at Bengaluru on Hard.
James Duckworth leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
James Duckworth is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Giles Hussey (Jun 20).
Khumoyun Sultanov is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Fajing Sun (Apr 16).
Share this match
