ITF M25 · Round of 32 · M25 Hillcrest
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Beaven
⚙️ Grinder
Eqbal
🛡️ The Spoiler
Matchup analysis
⚙️ Grinder vs 🛡️ The Spoiler is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 1,642 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when James Beaven plays Ishaque Eqbal.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Beaven | Eqbal |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–3 | - |
| Avg odds | 5.00 | - |
| ROI % | -52.5% | - |
| Units P/L | -2.10u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Beaven
0
Eqbal
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Beaven | Eqbal |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 66.4% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 73.2% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 57.8% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 3.1 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 1.7 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 56.1% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 37.3% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 52.3% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 48.9% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 55.8% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 57% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
James Beaven and Ishaque Eqbal face off in the Round of 32 at M25 Hillcrest on Hard.
James Beaven leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
James Beaven is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Tom Zeuch (Jun 10).
Ishaque Eqbal is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Rohan Mehra (Mar 23).
Share this match
