WTA 250 · Quarterfinals · Shenzhen
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Begu
🎯 Baseliner
Babos
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
🎯 Baseliner vs 🤖 Servebot is historically tight (49% vs 51%, 916 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Irina Camelia Begu plays Timea Babos.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Begu | Babos |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 3–2 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.89 | - |
| ROI % | +40.4% | - |
| Units P/L | +2.02u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
2
Begu
1
Babos
Jan 1, 2018
Shenzhen
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Oct 17, 2016
Moscow
H Hard · Round of 32
Aug 1, 2016
Florianopolis
H Hard · Final
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Begu | Babos |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 74.5% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 44.7% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 23.1% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 1 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 1 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 45.5% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 36.6% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 50% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 66.7% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 38.5% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Irina Camelia Begu and Timea Babos face off in the Quarterfinals at Shenzhen on Hard.
Irina Camelia Begu leads 2-1 over 3 previous meetings.
Irina Camelia Begu is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Karolina Muchova (Jun 24).
Timea Babos is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Ekaterina Makarova (Jul 15).
Share this match
