WTA 500 · Round of 32 · Charleston
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Begu
🏹 Frontrunner
Sands
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
🏹 Frontrunner vs 💥 Big Hitter is historically tight (49% vs 51%, 1,517 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Irina Camelia Begu plays Bethanie Mattek Sands.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Begu | Sands |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 2–1 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.59 | - |
| ROI % | +6.0% | - |
| Units P/L | +0.18u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 4 career meetings
4
Begu
0
Sands
May 23, 2016
Roland Garros
C Clay · Round of 128
Apr 4, 2016
Charleston
C Clay · Round of 32
May 25, 2015
Roland Garros
C Clay · Round of 128
Feb 16, 2015
Rio de Janeiro
C Clay · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Begu | Sands |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 74.5% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 44.7% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 23.1% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 1 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 1 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 45.5% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 36.6% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 50% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 66.7% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 38.5% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 33% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Irina Camelia Begu and Bethanie Mattek Sands face off in the Round of 32 at Charleston on Clay.
Irina Camelia Begu leads 4-0 over 4 previous meetings.
Irina Camelia Begu is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Diane Parry (Jun 21).
Bethanie Mattek Sands is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Linda Fruhvirtova (Jan 30).
Share this match
