ATP Challenger Tour · Semifinals · Recanati
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Marchenko
💥 Big Hitter
Fucsovics
🎯 Baseliner
Matchup analysis
💥 Big Hitter vs 🎯 Baseliner is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 2,807 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Illya Marchenko plays Marton Fucsovics.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Marchenko | Fucsovics |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 0–5 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.64 |
| ROI % | - | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | - | -5.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 4 career meetings
4
Marchenko
0
Fucsovics
Jul 26, 2016
Segovia
H Hard · Semifinals
Jul 20, 2016
Recanati
H Hard · Semifinals
Feb 12, 2015
Wroclaw
H Hard · Round of 16
Jan 19, 2015
Australian Open
H Hard · 2nd Round Qualifying
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Marchenko | Fucsovics |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 61.2% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 71.8% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 49.6% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 5.6 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 5.4 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 62.9% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 24.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 44% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 29.4% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 21.5 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 28.5 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 75.4% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 48% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Illya Marchenko and Marton Fucsovics face off in the Semifinals at Recanati on Hard.
Illya Marchenko leads 4-0 over 4 previous meetings.
Illya Marchenko is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Cagan Efe Tufecki (Jan 5).
Marton Fucsovics is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Brandon Nakashima (Jun 16).
Share this match
