ATP 500 · Round of 16 · Tokyo
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Chung
🧱 The Wall
Cilic
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 62% vs 🧱 The Wall across 1,638 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Marin Cilic here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the the wall's elite returner. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Chung | Cilic |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 8–2 | 4–6 |
| Avg odds | 2.08 | 1.95 |
| ROI % | +40.2% | -27.5% |
| Units P/L | +4.02u | -2.75u |
Prior meetings and scores · 4 career meetings
1
Chung
3
Cilic
Oct 3, 2019
Tokyo
H Hard · Round of 16
Jan 7, 2016
Brisbane
H Hard · Round of 16
Oct 2, 2015
Shenzhen
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Aug 5, 2015
Washington
H Hard · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Chung | Cilic |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 59.4% | 60.9% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 71.6% | 71.5% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 48.3% | 50.8% |
| Aces / Match | 2.2 | 6 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.4 | 2.5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 52.3% | 56.6% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 40.2% | 28.5% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 59.9% | 46.6% |
| BP Converted % | 53.8% | 40% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 17.3 | 18 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 32.7 | 26.4 |
| Net Pts Won % | 53.9% | 73.6% |
| Total Pts Won % | 54.7% | 49.6% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 71% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Hyeon Chung and Marin Cilic face off in the Round of 16 at Tokyo on Hard.
Hyeon Chung leads 1-3 over 4 previous meetings.
Hyeon Chung is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Alan Magadan (Jun 9).
Marin Cilic is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Ugo Humbert (Jun 16).
Share this match
