ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 32 · Szczecin
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Hurkacz
🤖 Servebot
Lamasine
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 58% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 4,477 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Hubert Hurkacz here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Hurkacz | Lamasine |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 9–6 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.88 | - |
| ROI % | +5.7% | - |
| Units P/L | +0.86u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
2
Hurkacz
1
Lamasine
Jan 10, 2019
Canberra
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Oct 2, 2016
Budapest
H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 8, 2015
Szczecin
C Clay · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Hurkacz | Lamasine |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 62.3% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 68.5% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 53% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 8.3 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.8 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 57.4% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 26.1% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 40.3% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 32.5% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 27.4 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 28.9 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 68.7% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 47.6% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 62% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Hubert Hurkacz and Tristan Lamasine face off in the Round of 32 at Szczecin on Clay.
Hubert Hurkacz leads 2-1 over 3 previous meetings.
Hubert Hurkacz is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Daniel Altmaier (Jun 17).
Tristan Lamasine is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Marat Sharipov (Jul 14).
Share this match
