ATP Challenger Tour · Quarterfinals · Winnipeg
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Moriya
🪃 Counterpuncher
Ilkel
👑 The Complete Package
Matchup analysis
🪃 Counterpuncher vs 👑 The Complete Package is historically tight (48% vs 52%, 1,062 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Hiroki Moriya plays Cem Ilkel.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Moriya | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 8–7 | 0–1 |
| Avg odds | 2.09 | 3.61 |
| ROI % | -5.2% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | -0.78u | -1.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
1
Moriya
2
Ilkel
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Moriya | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 61.2% | 53.9% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 66.9% | 70.8% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 54.8% | 51.2% |
| Aces / Match | 1.9 | 3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.3 | 5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 43.5% | 71.4% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 30.7% | 41.9% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 56% | 46.4% |
| BP Converted % | 42% | 100% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 9.5 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 38 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 35.7% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 51.6% | 53.8% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 45% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Hiroki Moriya and Cem Ilkel face off in the Quarterfinals at Winnipeg on Hard.
Hiroki Moriya leads 1-2 over 3 previous meetings.
Hiroki Moriya is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Hoyoung Roh (Jun 20).
Cem Ilkel is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Vladyslav Orlov (May 17).
Share this match