ITF M25 · Round of 32 · M25 Montreal
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
🪃 Counterpuncher
Cao
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
🪃 Counterpuncher vs ⚙️ Grinder is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 4,082 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Guillaume Dalmasso plays Adam Farag Cao.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Cao | |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 6–5 | 1–0 |
| Avg odds | 2.62 | 1.68 |
| ROI % | +1.4% | +68.0% |
| Units P/L | +0.15u | +0.68u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
0
Cao
Nov 9, 2025
Drummondville
H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying
Nov 3, 2025
M25 Montreal
H Hard · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Cao | |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 64.2% | 59.2% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 69.2% | 64.5% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 49% | 52% |
| Aces / Match | 4.3 | 2 |
| Double Faults / Match | 6.7 | 1.8 |
| Break Points Saved % | 39.2% | 71.6% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 31.7% | 31.8% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 54.8% | 51.3% |
| BP Converted % | 40.7% | 33% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 20.3 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 37 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 73.1% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 51.4% | 49.5% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 57% | 50% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Guillaume Dalmasso and Adam Farag Cao face off in the Round of 32 at M25 Montreal on Hard.
Guillaume Dalmasso leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Guillaume Dalmasso is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Joaquin Guilleme (Jun 13).
Adam Farag Cao is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Zhengyu Sun (May 18).
Share this match
