ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 32 · Pau
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Brouwer
⚙️ Grinder
Nava
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
Both Gijs Brouwer and Emilio Nava are ⚙️ Grinder types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit. Across 4,528 matches in our dataset, the historical split is about even.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Brouwer | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–3 | 16–9 |
| Avg odds | 2.35 | 1.98 |
| ROI % | -44.3% | -2.4% |
| Units P/L | -1.77u | -0.59u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Brouwer
0
Nava
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Brouwer | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 63% | 65% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 53.8% | 69.8% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 40.4% | 47.2% |
| Aces / Match | 1.3 | 5.6 |
| Double Faults / Match | 7 | 3.2 |
| Break Points Saved % | 48.1% | 57.7% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 31.4% | 31.8% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 54% | 45.3% |
| BP Converted % | 48.6% | 41.9% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 30.7 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 41.8 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 64.8% |
| Total Pts Won % | 44.5% | 49.4% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Daniel Michalski
PLOVDIV CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jun 22
Ivan Gakhov
Shymkent Challenger 2 · Round of 32
Apr 29
Manas Dhamne
Shymkent Challenger 2 · Round of 16
Apr 29
Petr Bar Biryukov
Shymkent Challenger 1 · Round of 32
Apr 20
Lucas Poullain
M25 Saint-Dizier · Round of 32
Mar 23
Matchup overview
Gijs Brouwer and Emilio Nava face off in the Round of 32 at Pau on Hard.
Gijs Brouwer leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Gijs Brouwer is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Daniel Michalski (Jun 22).
Emilio Nava is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Hamish Stewart (Jun 20).
Share this match
