WTA 250 · Round of 32 · Olympics
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Muguruza
🤖 Servebot
Hibino
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 54% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 2,124 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Garbine Muguruza here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Muguruza | Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 5–7 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.01 |
| ROI % | - | -36.1% |
| Units P/L | - | -4.33u |
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
3
Muguruza
0
Hibino
Aug 31, 2020
Us Open
H Hard · Round of 128
Aug 8, 2016
Olympics
H Hard · Round of 32
Feb 22, 2016
Doha
H Hard · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Muguruza | Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 69% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 54% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 38.4% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 1.2 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 2.5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 51.8% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 37% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 59% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 40% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 45.9% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 25% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Garbine Muguruza and Nao Hibino face off in the Round of 32 at Olympics on Hard.
Garbine Muguruza leads 3-0 over 3 previous meetings.
Garbine Muguruza is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Linda Noskova (Jan 30).
Nao Hibino is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Darja Semenistaja (Jun 24).
Share this match
