WTA 1000 · Round of 16 · Cincinnati
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Muguruza
🤖 Servebot
Pavlyuchenkova
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
Both Garbine Muguruza and Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova are 🤖 Servebot types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit. Across 3,172 matches in our dataset, the historical split is about even.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Muguruza | Pavlyuchenkova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 0–1 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.38 |
| ROI % | - | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | - | -1.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 4 career meetings
4
Muguruza
0
Pavlyuchenkova
Jan 31, 2021
Yarra Valley Classic
H Hard · Round of 16
Jan 20, 2020
Australian Open
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Jun 18, 2018
Birmingham
G Grass · Round of 32
Aug 15, 2016
Cincinnati
H Hard · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Muguruza | Pavlyuchenkova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 57.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 50% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 50% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 4 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 2 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 50% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 24.4% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 61.9% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 16.7% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 42.4% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Garbine Muguruza and Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova face off in the Round of 16 at Cincinnati on Hard.
Garbine Muguruza leads 4-0 over 4 previous meetings.
Garbine Muguruza is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Linda Noskova (Jan 30).
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Alexandra Eala (Apr 21).
Share this match
