WTA 250 · Round of 16 · Lugano
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Ferro
🛡️ The Spoiler
Uytvanck
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 59% vs 🛡️ The Spoiler across 512 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Alison Van Uytvanck here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the the spoiler's strong court coverage. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Ferro | Uytvanck |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 2–7 | - |
| Avg odds | 6.25 | - |
| ROI % | -72.2% | - |
| Units P/L | -6.50u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Ferro
0
Uytvanck
Jan 20, 2020
Australian Open
H Hard · Round of 128
Apr 8, 2019
Lugano
C Clay · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Ferro | Uytvanck |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 73.6% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 60% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 47.1% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0.7 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 48.2% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 42.3% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 58.1% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 60.1% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 51.4% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 36% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Fiona Ferro and Alison Van Uytvanck face off in the Round of 16 at Lugano on Clay.
Fiona Ferro leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Fiona Ferro is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Greet Minnen (Jun 23).
Alison Van Uytvanck is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Jana Fett (Jul 22).
Share this match
